|
What
I Saw: Reports from Berlin 1920-1933. By Joseph Roth. W.W. Norton.
226 pages. $23.95.
At age 25 and newly demobilized after the conclusion of the First
World War, Joseph Roth returned to his native Vienna and began what
translator Michael Hofmann refers to as newspaper dependency.
This positive addiction to German language tabloids and broadsheets
eventually enriched the world of journalism and literature because
Roth was one of the leading wordsmiths in that late lamented period
known as Weimar daysthe twilight period of exuberant if chaotic
democracy which flourished in Germany from 1919 to 1933 when the
brown plague overran the nation of Goethe, Schiller, and Beethoven.
In Vienna and later Berlin, Roth wrote hundreds of articles from
his vantage point as culture critic. He left Berlin in 1925 (for
reasons which are not entirely clear) but continued to visit Berlin
regularly. At one time he was contributing essays and what we would
call today think pieces to half a dozen Berlin daily
newspapers.
Roths reportage is an extremely important phenomenon because
it represents a view of Germany before, in his own phrase, the Auto
Da Fé of the mind took over a highly advanced civilization.
Hofmanns English translation of Roths essays are smooth
and suggest the acerbic potency of the German original.
Although the introduction to this anthology does not focus on Roths
religious disposition, it is obvious that he was an assimilated
Jew, perhaps even one who, at one point, had gone over to Christianity.
Nonetheless, Roth displays a predilection for analyzing civilizational
issues with rabbinic acumen. He has, moreover, a gift for splicing
words together in new and original compounds. The skyscraper,
he writes, is the incarnate rebellion against the supposedly
unattainable; against the mystery of altitude, against the otherworldliness
of the cerulean.
What does Roth write about as he roams around the Berlin of the
interwar years? He inevitably chooses the mundane over the dramatic.
He is fascinated by the refugee quarter and by construction gangs
on Berlin streets. Traffic congestion preoccupies him as does old
peoples homes. Roth waxes eloquent on the appearances of skyscrapers
in his Berlin and whether they represent human arrogance or a new
partnership with nature.
Roth has an essay on a newly released convict and how his 50 years
behind walls has robbed him of the possibility of conceiving or
understanding modernity. In another piece, he reconstructs and recaptures
the sights, sounds, and smells of a popular German café.
He is one of the few writers who can examine the arrival of the
department store concept and show how escalators force clients to
view (and buy) merchandise they were not interested in!
With regard to issues more germane to Jews, several of his essays
highlight forays into Jewish sections of Berlin and feature meditations
on the plight of immigrants from eastern Europe. Roth writes with
a mixture of humor and irony as he describes a miniature Temple
of Solomon which an enterprising Hungarian Jew built and for which
he charged admission to see.
In his remarks about the Jewish quarter (Grenadierstrassea
series of wailing walls says Roth) he jumps from the
sardonic to the sarcastic but he does so with rare eloquence. This
is what Roth says of the Ten Commandments: With the help of
these terrible jagged letters, he gave the Jews the first terrible
moral law for them to spread among the cheerful, blithe peoples
of the world. It takes, I thought, a truly divine love to choose
these people. There were so many others that were nice, malleable,
and well trained: happy, balanced Greeks, adventurous Phoenicians,
artful Egyptians, Assyrians with strange imaginations, northern
tribes with beautiful, blond-haired, as it were, ethical primitiveness
and refreshing forest smells. But none of the above! The weakest
and far from loveliest of peoples was given the most dreadful curse
and most dreadful blessing, the hardest law and the most difficult
mission: to sow love on earth, and to reap hatred.
Roth was totally unsympathetic to Zionism, but his understanding
of it was restricted to very narrow focus. Referring to newspaper
accounts of fighting between Jews and Arabs in Palestine, Roth censures
what he believed to be the triumphalism behind Zionist reports of
those encounters because it reminds him of the odious military rhetoric
he had been exposed to in World War I. For Roth Zionism was an
experiment, a temporary, opportune degradation of Judaism, or perhaps
merely the reversion to a primal, long since outmoded, form of national
existence.
Four years after he published this statement, the Nazis took power
and proceeded to transform Zionism into the only viable option for
Jews. This is not acknowledged by Roth, but his 1933 essay is a
searing statement about the apotheosis of the barbarians,
the mechanized march of mechanized orangutans. He writes that
the triumph of Nazism means the capitulation of the European
mind. Roth notes that Jewish writers in Germany, having been
banished and victimized, represent the true strain of German democracynot
their Aryan counterparts.
In what is perhaps a non sequitur, Roth comes down hard on German
Jews who sought acceptance by describing themselves as German
citizens of the Jewish faith. Why, asks Roth, did they use
the word citizen and not simply say Germans.
The very formulation of their identity thus emphasized that German
Jews never felt themselves to be part of the German nation or people.
Even their attempts to baptize Judaism in order to make
it more accommodating to the German folk was doomed to failure.
The final point which Roth makes in this indictment of Nazism pivots
on his recitation of the contribution of Jewish writers in Germany
whose insights helped refine, among other things, the importance
of urban civilization with its bars, factories, cafés, and
hotels. Roth then notes ironically that this German-Jewish literature
of the city was cited by the antisemites as proof that Jews had
no rootedness in the soil of Germany.
Roth died in Paris in 1939 two months before the Nazis unleashed
the war that eventually destroyed the civilization that he has resurrected
for us so poignantly in this series of essays.
Updated 3/19/03
|
|
 |
|
Arnold
Ages, a professor in the University of Waterloo (Ontario),
serves as scholar-in residence at Toronto Beth Tzedec congregation
|
| |
|